Domestic violence judgements

Following are some of the DV judgments:

 

• Wife has no right to stay in Parents in law’s House
• Second wife entitled to maintanance? DV ACT makes it!!
• Prove home violence for relief: court
• Prove home violence for relief: court
• Your house caould be broke open with a Exparte DV order!!!
• DV can filed for acts even before the Act came into force HC
• Domestic violence Act: No retrospective effect(dv put to grab flat)
• batra – batra_SC
• Chennai_HC
• Chennai_hc_1_against
• CJ_caution _against_misuse_of_FV_Act
• DV_examined_by_SC
• DV_Judgment_AP_HC_Retrospective_Operation
• dv-act-court-to-funish-order-copies-at-the-time-of-reading-out-the-order
• FAQonProtectionOfWomen1
• FAQonProtectionOfWomen2
• how-not-to-file-an-quash-in-a-dv-case-or-how-to-screw-up-your-own-quash
• JoshiVsJoshi BomHC (Bahu has no right over saas’ property)
• kapil-vs-urvashi
• No_retrospective
• no-quash-if-magistrate-handling-dv-case-erred-in-procedure
• no-use-in-filing-rcreven-wife-refusing-to-join-hubby-gets-relief-under-dv-act
• no-use-in-tranfering-house-to-your-mumdv-act-will-apply-re-shared-household
• shaleen-kabra-vs-shivani-kabra-dv-act-2008
• swarup-sarkar-dv-act-judgment-2007
• the-dv-act-may-be-applied-retrospectively
• Magistrate has to ensure that copy of the order is made available same day—HIGH Court of Kerala
• There is no bar for the aggrieved person to seek the other part of the reliefs under the Act before a Civil Court or a Family Court or a Crimin
• Sale deed must be registered to relinquish all the claim on property
• Procedure in DV act
• Quash failed
• Quash failed(procedure)
• Crpc in family court. Husband sought transfer of DV from magistrate court to family court (Dismissed)
• Magistrate should not insist on the personal presence of the petitioner
• Fraud played by petitioner by giving wrong addresss of the respondent. Still not quashed
• Family Court or Civil Court to deal with an application under Section 12
• Wife sought transfer of from the fire of the II Additional Family Court, Chennai to the file of the Sub-Court, Chengalpattu. REJECTED.
• Wife sought transfer from Chennai to vellor. Rejected
• HC: Don’t come directly to us. contentions must be raised before the Appellate/Sessions Court in a properly instituted appeal under Section 29
• HC: Don’t approach us saying all allegations are false. If false then tell magistrate
• HC: The petitioners must appear before the learned Magistrate and raise all their contentions. Don’t come to us for quash
• First go to session court under section 29
• AP HC: Women cannot be made respondent
• Interesting property judgment (DV Act)
• Intresting case
• Females cannot be made respondent. Even though provision of appeal is there is section 29 but sometime for immediate relief Section 482 of the
• DV can be filed in the family court under section 8, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the Act, 2005 but not under section 12
• Shared house hold examined by HC
• proceedings cannot be quashed for the only alleged reason that the allegations raised in the present complaint are inconsistent with the averme
• Magistrate should be careful in passing orders.
• 482 cannot be invoked because of procedure violations
• Raise all objection before appellate court, before coming to us : HC
• DV victim can stay in the first floor room
• DV and all cases settled in the transfer petition in SC
• IN DV personal presence of KIDS not must to decide application.
• HC: daughterinlaw cannot enter fatherinlaw’s house if the relationship between husband wife is strained
• Since no relief is claimed against petitioners 2 to 11, it is unnecessary to continue the proceedings against them and continuation of the proc
• A DV case involving properties
• HC wrongly transferred case from one state to another.
• Procedural violation in DV: View of HC
• In both cases of final and interim order session court is the court of appeal
• minor procedural deviation being technical in nature, need not be taken serious note off and on that ground, the proceedings pending under the
• After 20 yrs wife appeared and claiming DV relief
• A woman has her rights of maintenance against her husband or sons/daughters. She can assert her rights, if any, against the property of her hus
• DV judgment : HC
• Bitter fight of couple ended by HC
• HC direction for speedy disposal in DV case
• Another case of HC direction for speedy disposal in DV case
• Appointment of protection officer must
• Argument needs to be carried out before Magistrate

Advertisement